Peter Makk vs Liam Broady Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Recently, Liam Broady has won 42.23% of points on his second serve, compared to Peter Makk's 47.34%. Will this give Makk an edge in their match? It seems likely.
• Return Game Analysis: Broady has won 41.92% of opponent's second serve points, while Makk has a slight advantage at 42.05%. On first serve returns, Broady and Makk stand at 26.54% and 26.28%, respectively. This suggests a very narrow difference in return games.
• Performance Under Pressure: Broady saves 48.45% of breakpoints in pressure situations, but Makk excels here with 55.56% saved. Could this be a deciding factor?
• Yearly Performance: Over the last year, Broady has secured 67.69% of his matches, slightly higher than Makk's 64.52%. However, Makk has shown impressive form by winning more convincingly with fewer losses.
• Preferred Surface: Both players favor Hard courts, with Makk holding a 68% win rate versus Broady's 63%. Does this suggest a surface advantage for Makk?
• Event Level Success: Broady shows strong performance in $10K events with 73.21% match wins, whereas Makk follows closely with 66.67%. The level of competition may influence the outcome significantly.
• Head-to-Head Record: Makk holds a lead having won their only previous encounter, defeating Broady in straight sets.
• Opponent Difficulty: Broady's recent opponents had an average rank of 390.78, while Makk faced tougher competition with an average rank of 289.97. This could indicate a readiness from Makk for harder matches.
• Deciding Set Stats: Broady's 58% win rate in deciding sets is overshadowed by Makk's 88%, hinting at stronger resilience in tight matches for Makk.

Editorial Prediction (September 25, 2025, UTC):

As the match approaches, both Liam Broady and Peter Makk exhibit strengths and weaknesses that could tip the scales either way during their encounter. Broady has the edge in match-winning stats over the past year, yet Makk has demonstrated stronger second serve performance and better breakpoint saving under pressure, statistics crucial for match leverage.

Although both players seem equally matched in terms of return games, Makk's slight advantage in handling top-ranked opponents and thriving on hard courts adds to his potential winning formula. Their prior head-to-head meeting favors Makk, reinforcing his psychological edge.

Taking comprehensive performance trends into account, while there are solid grounds for both players, Peter Makk emerges as the likely winner, armed with superior stability in high-pressure conditions and enhanced capability to excel on his favorable surface.